February 13th, 2013 | Posted by Christopher Taylor in Uncategorized





2013 Florida Alimony Reform

2013 Florida Alimony Reform

Alimony is one of the most hotly contested issues in divorce cases.  In my experience as a Jacksonville divorce attorney, alimony is also one of the most difficult issues to litigate. Unlike child support payments, there is no set formula to determine how much alimony should be awarded, assuming an alimony award is appropriate at all.

The most contentious cases usually involve permanent alimony.  Permanent alimony is available following a long term marriage when other forms of alimony are not appropriate. Under Florida law, a marriage is considered long term after 17 plus years. Although it’s called “permanent alimony”, the term is misleading due to the fact an award may be modified or terminated based upon a substantial change in circumstances. However, if circumstances don’t change, permanent alimony can continue for life.

A Florida group called Florida Alimony Reform (“FAR”) is spearheading efforts to reform Florida’s alimony laws with a particular focus on permanent alimony. According to FAR, Florida’s alimony laws are stuck in a 1950s “Leave It to Beaver” paradigm where the husband is cast as the primary breadwinner and the wife as a stay-at-home mother with limited career prospects.  FAR argues that permanent alimony causes financial entanglement between divorced spouses long after a marriage has ended, discourages spouses receiving alimony from remarrying or improving career prospects, and places a lifetime burden on the paying spouse. FAR cites examples of healthy spouses (most often women) in their 30s and 40s receiving permanent alimony with ample time to retrain and improve their career prospects.


Florida House Bill 231, aimed at reforming Florida’s alimony laws, supported by FAR and sponsored by Ritch Workman (R-Melboune) is working its way through Florida’s 2013 legislative session. Here are some highlights of the proposed changes to Florida alimony law:

1)      Create a presumption of no alimony in “short term” marriages lasting less than 10 years.

2)      No presumption of alimony in “mid-term” marriages lasting 10 to 20 years. A mid-term marriage spouse would be required to show by a preponderance of evidence a need for alimony.

3)      There would be a presumption of alimony in marriages lasting more than 20 years; however, there would be a set formula limiting alimony payments.

4)      Imputes income to spouses receiving alimony based on past recent employment.

5)      Allows for termination of alimony when the paying spouse reaches the Social Security retirement age.

For more detail than described above, please read the original filed version of Florida House Bill 231.

If you have questions about alimony in the Jacksonville, Florida area, please contact us at 904-339-5298 or through this website. Your first consultation is free.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

7 Responses

  • Debbie Leff Israel says:

    Dear Christopher,
    Do you support alimony reform and the efforts of FAR? If you do, please contact me at the given email address. I look forward to hearing from you. http://www.facebook.com/debbie.leff

  • Dani Pearson says:

    Alimony reform is long overdue.

  • Terry Power says:


    It is fairer to all parties to have guidelines so that Alimony can work just like child support – a fixed formula with a fixed duration. No one fights about the amount and term of child support.

    Why should alimony be any different?

  • Gerry Hill says:

    My Ex goes around proud she retired at 39 and feels she does not have to work due to Life Time Alimony I ve been paying 13 years after a 19 year marriage. She moved to California with her boy friend to hide her lifestyle approx 5 years ago after living with him off and on 4 years in Jacksonville. I pray this life time slavery will end for me with this new law. I can assure you I will lead a charge to anyone I know to stay away from Family Law attorneys who think the law as it stands is good! A good attorney with common sense that is not out for the almighty $$$ would support the change in this new law. If fact I’m already looking for an attorney who supports the new law once it passes. I figured it would be the best time to research this now rather than later so I truely know how the attorney stands. Thanks

    • Thank you for your post.

      To me it’s a complex issue without a lot of easier answers. In many ways it’s more difficult for a practicing divorce attorney to take a stand on alimony, because I see both sides of the issue. It’s hard to view alimony reform in black and white terms, because each situation is different. A person in good health who receives permanent alimony at 39, with the ability to obtain job skills, is different from a person who receives at permanent alimony at age 55. With that said, I do agree with provisions that make it easier to terminate alimony when the alimony payor reaches social security retirement age.

      Some of my biggest concerns about the current alimony reform bill is its impact on short term alimony. I’ve written about my concerns here: http://www.jacksonvilledivorcelawattorney.com/family-law-blog/florida-alimony-reform-too-far-on-short-term-alimony/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *